Re: gcc 2.7.2.3 vs gcc 2.8.1 -- DUPLICATES

Barry Treahy (treahy@mmaz.com)
Wed, 05 Aug 1998 14:42:03 -0700

Is anyone else getting duplicate messages? I just recieved a large group that
had numerous duplicates, and looking at the SMTP headers, I see
vger.rutgers.edu receiving and forwarding the same message with different time
stamps...

Barry

nuke@bayside.net wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Aug 1998, Matthew D. Pitts wrote:
>
> > Taral,
> >
> > > What exactly prevents us from using gcc 2.8.1 to compile the kernel? I
> > keep
> > > seeing stuff like "we can't compile <insert patch here> under gcc
> > 2.7.2.3."
> > If I'm not mistaken, it's because gcc 2.8.1 (aka egcs 1.0.3) tries
> > optimizations that don't work with 2.0.x kernels. It does work on the
> > 2.1.x kernels AFAIK.
>
> i'm not sure about stock gcc 2.8.1, but egcs-1.0.3 and a very recent pgcc
> snapshot compile both just fine here.
> _ _ __ __ _ _ _
> | / |/ /_ __/ /_____ | Nuke Skyjumper |
> | / / // / '_/ -_) | "Master of the Farce" |
> |_ /_/|_/\_,_/_/\_\\__/ _|_ nuke@bayside.net _|
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html