Re: CIPE - Encrypted IP Encapsulation
Alexander Kjeldaas (astor@guardian.no)
Tue, 4 Aug 1998 19:01:25 +0200
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Jon Lewis: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 01:53:53PM +0100, Manuel J. Galan wrote:
>
> Something alike is IMHO _essentially required_ right now if we
> pretend to make Linux a serious OS.
>
Another way of putting it is that we would have something that the
commercial OSes can't provide outside the US - strong, high-quality
crypto :-).
astor
--
Alexander Kjeldaas, Guardian Networks AS, Trondheim, Norway
http://www.guardian.no/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html
- Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Previous message: David S. Miller: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"
- Reply: Jon Lewis: "Re: [PATCH] [SECURITY] suid procs exec'd with bad 0,1,2 fds"