> The change in fs/dcache.c does not look very well because
> as higher the number given to prune_dache in shrink_dcache_memory
> as more the dcache is pruned ... `0' isn't that good is it?
Werner, have you given it a shot? With this fix in place, the
dcache/inode fragmentation issues in 2.1 are very dramatically improved
on low memory. I'm very pleased indeed with this patch: even if it's
only prune_dcache(0), it is still being called much more often when we
get short of memory.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html