> >>>>> "Jon" == Jon M Taylor <taylorj@ecs.csus.edu> writes:
>
> Jon> # CONFIG_FAT_FS is not set
> Jon> CONFIG_MSDOS_FS=y
> Jon> # CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS is not set
> Jon> CONFIG_VFAT_FS=y
>
> The problem is the missing CONFIG_FAT_FS. In linux/fs/Config.in,
> CONFIG_MSDOS_FS, CONFIG_UMSDOS_FS and CONFIG_VFAT_FS are all dependent
> on CONFIG_FAT_FS, so it should be impossible to choose them w/o also
> choosing CONFIG_FAT_FS.
Huh. It isn't, as you can see. Why is CONFIG_FAT_FS even a
separate option? Couldn't it be automatically made if any of the three
CONFIG_ targets that depend on it are selected? Is there any use to
having CONFIG_FAT_FS enabled without any of the others?
> Which fooconfig did you make(1)?
Menuconfig.
--- 'Cloning and the reprogramming of DNA is the first serious step in becoming one with God.' - Scientist G. Richard Seed
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html