Re: lock, mutex etc.

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 21 Jul 1998 16:21:31 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] New phys_addr() syscall"
Previous message: Bob Lorenzini: "110 funny"

> At any time, there is only *ONE* process(or thread) in kernel. Linux
> have a long way to each really SMP-kernel.

Not in 2.1.x - 2.1.x has a fairly full collection of semaphores, reader/write
and spinlocks

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: [PATCH] New phys_addr() syscall"
Previous message: Bob Lorenzini: "110 funny"