INN compiled with gcc 2.7.2.3 is OK. Any insight? I've CCd this to the
Linux and INN lists because perhaps
- INN people know that INN does some exotic bit-munging which breaks
gcc, or
- Linux has subtle inconsistencies between 2.0 and 2.1 which makes
stuff compiled on 2.1 fail on 2.0?
Both would be serious bugs, either in gcc or Linux (or even INN?). I
suspect gcc but does INN really contain code which is so critical, or
is gcc just still broken and unfit for public consumption like 2.8.0 was?
olaf
PS. I compiled Mozilla (16MB, gzipped) with 2.8.1 and it works (modulo
lesstif bugs). Nobody claimed that _that_ is clean code.
PPS. gcc 2.8.1 _seems_ to run faster than 2.7.2.3, but maybe that's
just me...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html