Re: patch-ikd+profile+stack-meter against 109

Michael L. Galbraith (mikeg@weiden.de)
Sun, 19 Jul 1998 10:35:44 +0200 (MET DST)


On Sat, 18 Jul 1998, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:

> On Sat, 18 Jul 1998, Michael L. Galbraith wrote:
>
> >Do you think something like glimpse indexing a small (3.6g) array would
> >be better? One BIG process doing massive fs job.
>
> I think yes. Please also upgrade to my latest idk patch (-3) since I was
> accounting the stack only for process with pid != 0 but I can' t see any
> good reason to not account also the stack for the pid 0 (an so for the
> interrupts that happens while idle was running). The same should be true
> for KSTACK_MAGIC.
>
> Andrea[s] Arcangeli

OK, done. Identical results.

-Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html