> kernel approx rusting effect
> 2.0.33 38 --> 30 (improves!)
> 2.1.96 37 --> 263
It would be nice to see which kernel started to perform bad. It would be
nice to have the same performance result for:
2.1.42
2.1.43 (then you can fsck your hd ;-)
2.1.50
2.1.60
.... maybe using log(n) time to find the patch that caused
the major bad performance increase.
I really have no time to do that :-( (nor I have older patches than
2.1.9x here).
I read some time ago that a guy said that bad performances started in 43
which insert the new dcache code. Are we really sure that the dcache code
is not the cause of this slowdown?
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html