Jeanette> On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 at 02:48:29PM -0400, Alex Buell wrote:
>> Oh dear. This on a 16MB machine that's been up a week. Seems to be
>> a lot of fragmentation there.
Jeanette> same here. Machine has been up 35 days and contains 64MB
Jeanette> RAM.
Jeanette> ...snipp...
Jeanette> It does not seem this machine has much room for allocating
Jeanette> 8K (except for the single 64K and 16K slab) Or maybe we are
Jeanette> interpreting the info in slabinfo incorrectly?
What is the correct way of interpreting slabinfo? Quick summary from a
mm guru? What do the two cols mean?
Is this slabinfo gonna be usefull to fixing/diagnosing the current mm
problems? Perhaps someone would like to collect a bunch of them (off
list) and summarize?
I also have a test machine I can boot with mem=whatever and test if
anyone wants me to.
My info (my main machine, running 2.1.108 for almost 12 days):
slabinfo - version: 1.0
kmem_cache 27 42
tcp_tw_bucket 1 42
tcp_bind_bucket 68 127
tcp_open_request 0 63
skbuff_head_cache 8 75
sock 206 228
dquot 0 0
filp 1850 1890
signal_queue 0 0
buffer_head 6572 6888
mm_struct 142 186
vm_area_struct 3180 3591
files_cache 142 168
uid_cache 21 127
size-131072 0 0
size-65536 0 0
size-32768 0 0
size-16384 2 2
size-8192 1 2
size-4096 12 44
size-2048 153 224
size-1024 9 24
size-512 25 32
size-256 14 28
size-128 7169 7475
size-64 235 252
size-32 7107 7812
slab_cache 49 126
kevin
-- Kevin Fenzi kevin@scrye.com http://scrye.com/~kevin/- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.altern.org/andrebalsa/doc/lkml-faq.html