> Not quite true. 486DX4-100 is faster than P66. 486DX4-133 is faster than
> P75. (according to benchmarks under Win95 and lower)
*Bzzt* According to what I've been told, that's nonsense. I wouldn't trust
Windows95 benchmarks. The only true benchmark is how well an superior
operating system uses the resources of the system. Linux does
exceptionally well on a 486DX and even better on a Pentium.
So, a P66 would actually be faster than a 486DX4/100 on Linux, and
P75 would be faster than a 486DX4/133 again, on Linux.
DO NOT TRUST WINDOWS 95! It's telling you porkies and parts of it is still
16 bits! Sorry, couldn't resist that one.
Cheers,
Alex
-- /\_/\ Legalise cannabis now! ( o.o ) Smoke some cannabis today! > ^ < Peace, Love, Unity and Respect to all.http://www.tahallah.demon.co.uk
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu