>I'm unconvinced. It's pretty clear that the underlying problem is that
>the cache is far too agressive when you are copying large amounts of
>data around. The fact that interactive performance is bad suggests not
>that the swapping algorithm is making bad decisions, but that it is
>being forced to work with far too little physical memory due to the
>cache size.
Yes, this is exactly what I think too.
Andrea[s] Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu