Re: Wheee.. 2.1.108ac2

Horst von Brand (vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl)
Wed, 08 Jul 1998 09:22:02 -0400

Chris Wedgwood <chris@cybernet.co.nz> said:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 1998 at 06:17:04AM -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> > I thought the acX patches were serial (i.e. patch with ac1 then ac2,
> > etc). Does this mean we should ignore 108ac1 and apply ac2 to a clean
> > 2.1.108 source tree?

> ac1-ac2 is the diff. between ac2 and ac2 (obviously). ac2 (alone) is the
> diff between the kernel tree and ac2.
>
> Both don't always exist, time constraints I guess.

In this case, 2.1.108-ac1 is broken (as a patch); 2.1.108-ac2 includes
everything that was in there.

-- 
Dr. Horst H. von Brand                       mailto:vonbrand@inf.utfsm.cl
Departamento de Informatica                     Fono: +56 32 654431
Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria              +56 32 654239
Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile                Fax:  +56 32 797513


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu