Re: Wheee.. 2.1.108ac2

Chris Wedgwood (chris@cybernet.co.nz)
Wed, 8 Jul 1998 10:14:33 +1200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: ELF loader naivity fix"
Previous message: Rob Riggs: "My bad (was: More Boomerang Fixes)"

On Tue, Jul 07, 1998 at 06:17:04AM -0500, Thomas Molina wrote:
> I thought the acX patches were serial (i.e. patch with ac1 then ac2,
> etc). Does this mean we should ignore 108ac1 and apply ac2 to a clean
> 2.1.108 source tree?

ac1-ac2 is the diff. between ac2 and ac2 (obviously). ac2 (alone) is the
diff between the kernel tree and ac2.

Both don't always exist, time constraints I guess.

-Chris

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: ELF loader naivity fix"
Previous message: Rob Riggs: "My bad (was: More Boomerang Fixes)"