Re: Thread implementations...

Henning P. Schmiedehausen (hps@tanstaafl.de)
28 Jun 1998 20:23:35 +0200

torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) writes:

>In short, it just sounds extremely silly to try to fight nagle with the
>wrong kinds of interfaces when we can _control_ nagle instead. Nagle is

I don't want to control nagle in every application. I'm happy with the
default setting and the ability to tack a header in front of a file
and send it out via a simple syscall.

In other words: I like the HP approach to add an writev to sendfile()

Kind regards
Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. Henning P. Schmiedehausen --                hps@tanstaafl.de
TANSTAAFL! Consulting - Unix, Internet, Security      


Hutweide 15                   Fon.: 09131 / 50654-0    "There ain't no such
D-91054 Buckenhof             Fax.: 09131 / 50654-20    thing as a free Linux"


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu