On Thu, 25 Jun 1998 13:53:36 +1000, Richard Gooch
<Richard.Gooch@atnf.CSIRO.AU> said:
> This may be true, but my point is that we *need* a decent madvise(2)
> implementation. It will be use to a greater range of applications than
> sendfile(2).
Not necessarily; we may be able to detect a lot of the relevant access
patterns ourselves. Ingo has had a swap prediction algorithm for a
while, and we talked at Usenix about a number of other things we can do
to tune vm performance automatically. 2.3 ought to be a great deal
better. madvise() may still have merit, but we really ought to be
aiming at making the vm system as self-tuning as possible.
--Stephen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu