> On Wed, Jun 17, 1998 at 12:02:25AM -0500, Shawn Leas wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jun 1998, Dean Gaudet wrote:
> >
> > > Or, just maybe, they wanted to have a system to do interoperability
> > > testing. It would be very welcome IMNSHO. I'm tired of discovering
> > > protocol flaws between their HTTP clients and Apache for them. There's
> > > any number of valid reasons they would run a linux box, and none of them
> > > have anything to do with windows being too unstable.
> >
> > You mean like how they've failed miserably to move hotmail's services over
> > to NT? They use FreeBSD for the web server, and in runs Apache. The mail
> > servers are solaris, because of kernel threading I hear.
> >
> > Case In Point - One for the home team
>
> nope.
>
> Dead _never_ said windows was stable. He just said there were lots of
> reasons they might have a linux that aren't necessarily related to
> stability, and interoperability is one possibility.
I was agreeing. Sorry if I was unclear. Back to testing reiserfs. Wow,
what a difference. I gotta say, I can't wait till it's in the kernel. I
wish it could get in the 2.1 series, but probably not.
-Shawn
> -cw
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu