Re: setsockopt(RCVBUF) Invalid argument with 2.1.103

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 3 Jun 1998 14:30:19 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: AMD K6 "Bug""
Previous message: Derrik: "Re: ___ 2.0.34-pre11 (and pre16 too) /dev/mem broken???"

> But with Fast Ethernet and fast WAN connections times have changed. It was
> no useful to increase them in 2.0 because there is no window scaling there,
> but with the full RFC1323 support in 2.1 it might be an option.

It is not an option until Linus adds per user resource management including
locked pages. Full stop, end of story

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: AMD K6 "Bug""
Previous message: Derrik: "Re: ___ 2.0.34-pre11 (and pre16 too) /dev/mem broken???"