Re: New Cyrix patch for 2.0.33

Mike Jagdis (mike@roan.co.uk)
Tue, 26 May 1998 15:13:15 +0100 (GMT/BST)


On Mon, 25 May 1998, Rafael R. Reilova wrote:

> The correct algorithm, which is implemented in the posted patch is:
>
> 1. if has cpuid
> do cpuid
> else
> probe 486/386
> if !386 && flags are preserved across divison
> attempt enabling cpuid (do the dangerous 0x22,0x23 port stuff)
> goto 1
> end if
> end if
> 2. if vendor == Cyrix
> do cyrix DEVID detection stuff (more 0x22,0x23 stuff)
> end if
>
> This way, there no way of misdetecting a Pentium II for a Cyrix and play
> around with the BX ports.

Ah! So it's the Pentium II that "emulates" the Cyrix div behaviour...

> Since all Pentium II and MMX *have* cpuid.
> Cyrixes with the cpuid off by default get a second round at the cpuid
> code. Once we have cpuid all is well, since Cyrix specific code can be
> trivially excluded. I believe the patch to be quite ingenious and correct.

This is correct.

Mike

-- 
.----------------------------------------------------------------------.
|  Mike Jagdis                  |  Internet:  mailto:mike@roan.co.uk   |
|  Roan Technology Ltd.         |                                      |
|  54A Peach Street, Wokingham  |  Telephone:  +44 118 989 0403        |
|  RG40 1XG, ENGLAND            |  Fax:        +44 118 989 1195        |
`----------------------------------------------------------------------'

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu