Since we hope the sproglet will turn out nice, but might end up
spoiled rotten, wouldn't she be v2.3.0?
Robert
Thus spake Chris Wedgwood (chris@cybernet.co.nz):
> > Don't you mean "Linus v2.2.0" :) The last one coincided with v2.0, this
> > one conicided with 2.2, you've got to get BUSY if you're going to make
> > v2.4 (or 3.0???)... :)
>
> I wonder if 2.2 will become 3.0 this time (much as 1.4 became 2.0).
>
> Hey, he's the focal point of the kernel - he can rename it if he wants too.
>
> Anyhow, a kernel versioning system based upon sproglets seems like a good
> idea to me. Its something no other OS has...
>
>
>
>
>
> -Chris
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert L. Harris | NT is secure.... System Engineer For Hire. \_ as long as you don't remove the shrink wrap.
DISCLAIMER: These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu