> But its valid to change the owner of an existing sk_buff anyway
When changing the owner of an skb, is the memory supposed to be subtracted from
the previous owner's limit and then added to the new one? The current
skb_set_owner() code doesn't check for a prior owner -- perhaps we should add a
test for this?
Regards,
Bill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu