>Would it be disasterous to change their major number to be the same, or
>convince the distribution maintainers to make cua -> tty?
Yes. Please remember that device locking is done in user land, by files
named "LCK..ttyS*". If you have multiple names for the same device,
programs won't notice that "ttyS0" is already in use, if someone else has
"cua0" locked via the "LCK..cua0" lock file.
This is *exactly* what got us into this mess - we have to get rid of the
stupid idea of having multiple names for the very same device *FAST*.
It's a support nightmare (I'm the "a getty maintainer" Tytso mentioned who
wanted cua* support dropped ASAP).
I think Ted's idea is very good. We have to really hammer into people
that cua* devices are deprecated, and that only works if you flood them
with warning messages all over (I have been *telling* everybody this for
years, but this wasn't enough).
gert
-- email: gert@greenie.muc.de fax: +49-89-3244814 http://www.leo.org/~doeringLawrence Radiation Laboratory keeps all its data in an old gray trunk.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu