> Amen to that. I've just spent over a hour looking for a site that has
> these patches Alan mentions, let alone find versions that will patch
> against 2.0.29.
>
> Please Alan, do us all a BIG favor and give us the details of what and
> where, or package one up as stated previously, and us non kernel hackers
> who just want our ONE problem fixed will leave your list alone.
You all didn't look hard enough (and that didn't need an hour to find!):
http://www.linuxhq.com/lnxlists/linux-kernel/lk_9802_05/0602.html
-Andi
>
> Guest section DW wrote:
> > Nobody wants `Linux x.y.z patched with patch foo found at url-1 and patch
> > bar found at url-2'. Such a description in itself is too unstable.
> >
> > If you claim that a certain version of 2.0.* is the most stable Linux
> > kernel around, package it up as linux-2.0.29A.tar.gz and advertize it
> > as the most stable kernel around. Hundreds of people will use it and
> > be happy (hopefully).
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu