Re: 2.1.82 boot failure

Kirk Petersen (kirk@eidolon.speakeasy.org)
Wed, 28 Jan 1998 16:21:21 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: mlord: "Re: APM suspend/restore doesn't save IDE disk settings ?"
Previous message: Kurt Garloff: "Re: IRQ 255?"

> It works fine for me too, but on boot up, even though kerneld IS running,
> I still get "Ouch, no kerneld for message xxxxxxxxxx"
> (CONFIG_UNIX is a module)
>
> I'm sure when I complied unix domain sockets in, I didn't get this. Why
> would we be getting this message though, when kerneld IS running??

http://linux.ucs.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/9712.1/0277.html
(answers all questions)

-- 
Kirk Petersen
http://www.muppetlabs.com/~kirk/

Next message: mlord: "Re: APM suspend/restore doesn't save IDE disk settings ?"
Previous message: Kurt Garloff: "Re: IRQ 255?"