Re: OFFTOPIC: GGI and alternative GUIs and windowing systems in Linux -LONG

Stephen Williams (steve@icarus.icarus.com)
Wed, 28 Jan 1998 10:48:26 -0800


pavel@elf.ucw.cz said:
> And if you put ability to paint menus in server (which is IMO good
> think), you have additional advantage that you can select how
> *applications* will look on your desktop.

alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
> X is meant to provide services not policy. Thats very important. You
> can run your own policy engine and interface on the server if you wish

You can write a server under X that does exactly what Pavel says. We
see it every day in our window managers.

pavel@elf.ucw.cz said:
> No. In many cases (menus, dialog boxes, ...) it is really ineffective
> to transfer data by lines as X do it.

Who said that X transfers such things by lines?

Anyhow, even if the X server isn't perfect (it isn't) it is a far better
starting point then most of the other options. You can almost surely
implemented a better MS-Windows with X then the other way around:-)

-- 
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve@icarus.com              But I have promises to keep,
steve@picturel.com            and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."