Re: route del stilll fails in 2.1.81

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Sun, 25 Jan 1998 10:21:03 +1100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Chris Evans: "securelevel?"
Previous message: Chris Evans: "Re: /proc dubious hack?"
Maybe in reply to: Dietmar Kling: "route del stilll fails in 2.1.81"

On Sat, 24 Jan 1998 23:23:51 +0100,
Dietmar Kling <s_dkling@student.uni-ulm.de> wrote:
>I cannot delete a route in 2.1.81
>(using the newest netutils)
>minitiger:/usr/src/linux/Documentation # route del 192.168.2.0
>minitiger:/usr/src/linux/Documentation # route
>Kernel IP routing table
>Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface
>192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.255 H 0 0 0 eth0
>192.168.2.0 * 255.255.255.255 H 0 0 0 eth0 IT IS STILL HERE
>bellenberg.de * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0

Still there but not marked as UP, no 'U' flag. Routes are saved as
inactive to make it faster to reinstate them later. BTW, why define
192.168.2.0 as a host, should be -net.

Next message: Chris Evans: "securelevel?"
Previous message: Chris Evans: "Re: /proc dubious hack?"
Maybe in reply to: Dietmar Kling: "route del stilll fails in 2.1.81"