> > numeric constants. Again, the purpose of this patch is to centralize the
> > ioctl lists as much as possible and remove unnecessary code duplication.
> I really do not like idea of include/linux/ioctl with single file. Is
> it possible to move it to include/linux?
Well, I want to discourage people from using it --- it's meant to be
included from asm-{arch}/ioctls.h, not included by itself. I'm worried
that if I call it <linux/ioctls.h>, people will confuse it with
<linux/ioctl.h>.
I am open for other names, though. [Maybe I can put it in <linux/ioctls.h>
and flag it with #error if it is not included from asm-{arch}/ioctls.h?]
--Scott
@ @
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-oOO-(_)-OOo-=-=-=-=-=
C. Scott Ananian: cananian@lcs.mit.edu / Declare the Truth boldly and
Laboratory for Computer Science/Crypto / without hindrance.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology /META-PARRESIAS AKOLUTOS:Acts 28:31
-.-. .-.. .. ..-. ..-. --- .-. -.. ... -.-. --- - - .- -. .- -. .. .- -.
PGP key available via finger and from http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~cananian