> configurable option, and we need to make subsection in kernel config for
> security "features"
Well...
I have one proposal. While I work quiet near Yuri, I don't agree with him.
Of _course_ we cannot afford such a costly thing as standard violation in
this ugly way.
But. We can concider denial of not-owner-hardlinks as a security feature
for some special systems. I.e. this can be security option in kernel.
Thoose, who wants it this way - will enable it. For example, near
everybody who runs ifmail, will need it.
I can even imagine not-owner-hardlinks as not the only security option in
security options config sections.
What do you think?
// Егор Егоров.
// http://frigate.kiev.ua/~egor/