Re: <changed> Cyrix opt's

Brian Roberson (brianr@bst.ml.org)
Sun, 28 Dec 1997 04:33:38 -0600


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

would it be worth the time to get egcs or pgcc and
compiling with pent/Ppro
ops??, would I see any improvements??

At 03:52 AM 12/28/97 -0600, kwrohrer@enteract.com wrote:
>Because, unless you're using egcs or pgcc, the only
differences (in
>general) will be the alignments; no pentium or ppro-
specific optimizations
>are done by gcc. So, smaller binaries will take less
memory bandwidth,
>less cache (and VM) footprint, less disk loading
time...and thus be faster.
>Some of these reasons motivated CISC in the first place...
>
> Keith
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQA/AwUBNKYrAT3adekLPoD6EQLMHACdFZprog/13l6SVEsUB4fIzY8mtlQAn1zp
Vw8uzMC2ijKL8k7VFUtE6GzO
=RMVf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----