Re: Module versioning (was: Re: OFFTOPIC: binary modules, bad idea!)

Regis Duchesne (regis@via.ecp.fr)
Sun, 21 Dec 1997 14:18:42 +0100 (CET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: /proc/PID/fd/0 design "bug""
Previous message: Pawel S. Veselov: "Re: /proc/PID/fd/0 design "bug""
In reply to: Nicholas J. Leon: "Re: socket.h errors in ppp compile"

> I think it would be better to use forward declarations:
>
> struct foo;
>
> extern void foo_add( struct foo * p );
It is not mandatory with C. You can verify it.

Regis "HPReg" Duchesne - Engineering Student at ***** ******** *****
www http://www.via.ecp.fr/~regis/
(O o) I use Linux & 3Com (1135 KB/s over 10Mb/s ethernet)
--.oOO--(_)--OOo.-----------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Lars Marowsky-Bree: "Re: /proc/PID/fd/0 design "bug""
Previous message: Pawel S. Veselov: "Re: /proc/PID/fd/0 design "bug""
In reply to: Nicholas J. Leon: "Re: socket.h errors in ppp compile"