Re: Should only __kernel_ino_t and friends be used in kernel includes?

Michael Elizabeth Chastain (mec@shout.net)
Wed, 17 Dec 1997 14:02:57 -0600

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: RPC and Kernel NFS issues"
Previous message: Kevin Buhr: "Re: PATCH against 2.1.72: better symlinks for a better future (was Re: security warning)"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Bihlmeyer: "Should only __kernel_ino_t and friends be used in kernel includes?"

Hello Robbe,

> Shouldn't they use `__kernel_ino_t' instead?

Yes.

Michael Chastain
<mailto:mec@shout.net>
"love without fear"

Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: RPC and Kernel NFS issues"
Previous message: Kevin Buhr: "Re: PATCH against 2.1.72: better symlinks for a better future (was Re: security warning)"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Bihlmeyer: "Should only __kernel_ino_t and friends be used in kernel includes?"