Re: Linux 2.1.72 - a few oddities.

Alan Cox (
Wed, 10 Dec 1997 10:45:55 +0000 (GMT)

> Scanning through the patch file for 2.1.72, I'm a bit concerned about the
> following, for obvious reasons. "if(devc) vfree(devc);" is not a construct I'm
> particularly happy with, and three definitions of SO_BINDTODEVICE in

Ok whats the "obvious reasons" for wanting to execute vfree(NULL) but not
vfree(data). Please enlighten me 8)