Alan Cox:
> The real reason is much more fundamental than that. Implementors generally
> do test code but they tend to have included in the code all the checks for
> things that they thought might be unusual and break it. Those they didnt think
> of in the code they wont normally think of in the testing
Certainly. But whatever the exact reason is, there's really a need for
a ingeniously devilish test. And I use it as kind of an excuse for me
that the affs is so lousy in many respects. ;-)
-- Hans-Joachim Widmaier