Re: Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?

Joerg Pommnitz (pommnitz@darmstadt.gmd.de)
Tue, 18 Nov 1997 20:37:51 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: BrianR: "Re: Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?"
Previous message: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: VFS"
Maybe in reply to: John Robinson: "Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?"
Next in thread: Stefan Monnier: "Re: Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?"

> OK, explain me then, why when trying to login on an SMP production
> machine under 2.0.32 I had: Fork failed or No more process in a telnet
> session. Control+scrollLock showed me only 200 process in zombie state.

Sounds like a process not wait(2)ing for its children. That's almost
certainly not a kernel bug (maybe init crashed for some reason?).

Regards
Joerg

Next message: BrianR: "Re: Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?"
Previous message: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: VFS"
Maybe in reply to: John Robinson: "Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?"
Next in thread: Stefan Monnier: "Re: Opinion re 2.0.30->2.0.32 in stable production servers?"