Re: Style question: comparison between signed and unsigned?
Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 23 Sep 1997 19:49:36 +0100 (BST)
> When egcs ships to the great unwashed masses, it will probably get
> turned off, though you can turn it back on with a -W<mumble> option.
> Exactly like gcc is handling it now.
It would be nice to have a -W<mumble but dont worry about implicit types>
that does bitch about stuff but doesnt bitch about sizeof() and other
such compiler typed objects.