Re: ncpfs and umsdosfs: compile problems

Bill Hawes (whawes@star.net)
Tue, 23 Sep 1997 12:30:59 -0400

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Leslie F. Donaldson: "Re: Style question: comparison between signed and unsigned?"
Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Style question: comparison between signed and unsigned?"
Maybe in reply to: Benson L Chow: "ncpfs and umsdosfs: compile problems"

Benson L Chow wrote:
> Is there anyone having trouble compiling the ncpfs and umsdosfs as
> modules? I'm getting complaints of a missing struct definition... and
> only these two filesystems...

ncpfs and umsdosfs are currently broken, so the inability to compile can
be regarded as a feature :-)

Peter Waltenberg (see CC address) is pretty far along on fixing ncpfs
last I heard, so perhaps you could contact him.

I'm not sure of the status of umsdosfs -- anyone working on it?

Regards,
Bill

Next message: Leslie F. Donaldson: "Re: Style question: comparison between signed and unsigned?"
Previous message: Theodore Y. Ts'o: "Re: Style question: comparison between signed and unsigned?"
Maybe in reply to: Benson L Chow: "ncpfs and umsdosfs: compile problems"