Date: Mon, 15 Sep 1997 14:06:35 -0700
From: Larry McVoy <lm@linux.cobaltmicro.com>
Has anyone had any success w/ this? I'm having trouble figuring
out what is broken and I thought I'd ask before diving into it.
dhcpd requires SO_BINDTODEVICE support in the stack, these changes are
in 2.0.pre31, but have not yet been merged forward into 2.1.x
Later,
David "Sparc" Miller
davem@caip.rutgers.edu
You don't need SO_BINDTODEVICE unless you want to use multiple interfaces. I
had it working 10 months back as have many other people by adding a host
route from 255.255.255.255 to the relevant interface. (e.g. "route -add host
255.255.255.255 dev eth0")
If anyone needs more details I have a post I did about this from about 9
months back I can dig up.
-Chris