> > Here's the final summary all numbers are in cycles as reported by rdtsc.
> > This is using a set of assembly that executes the entire timing loop twice,
> > in an effort to get the caching right.
>
> for my Intel PODP83 things are different (worse) which is why I started
> this whole thread...
Can anyone tell me why do we inline the udelay code? Making it a separate
function IMHO won't cause any harm and all alignment problems would be gone.
Have a nice fortnight
-- Martin `MJ' Mares <mj@gts.cz> http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mj/ Faculty of Math and Physics, Charles University, Prague, Czech Rep., Earth "What's the difference between '486 and Pentium? About 2.10^-4"