Re: dhcpd in 2.1.55?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Anne: "oops on 2.1.54 under squake"
• Previous message: thospel@mail.dma.be: "Re: /proc/pci design idea"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry McVoy: "dhcpd in 2.1.55?"

Has anyone had any success w/ this? I'm having trouble figuring
out what is broken and I thought I'd ask before diving into it.

dhcpd requires SO_BINDTODEVICE support in the stack, these changes are
in 2.0.pre31, but have not yet been merged forward into 2.1.x

Later,
David "Sparc" Miller
davem@caip.rutgers.edu

• Next message: Anne: "oops on 2.1.54 under squake"
• Previous message: thospel@mail.dma.be: "Re: /proc/pci design idea"
• Maybe in reply to: Larry McVoy: "dhcpd in 2.1.55?"