Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish
Marcin Dalecki (dalecki@sub994.sub.uni-goettingen.de)
Wed, 20 Aug 1997 11:49:33 +0200 (MET DST)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: kwrohrer@enteract.com: "Re: pre-31-7 does badblocks better than -6"
- Previous message: Peter Holzer: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
- Next in thread: Alex Belits: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
- Reply: Alex Belits: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
- Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Alex Belits wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 1997, Erik Corry wrote:
>
> ...
> > Linux has already standardised on UTF-8 for the console.
>
> (looking at the console...) No, still looks like koi8-r for me... Having
> the internal support doesn't mean that it's usable enough to make it
> mandatory everywhere.
Which is unusable for Latin-2 consoles too... Actually I tried to get the
bordering chars in /usr/src/linuc# make menuconfig <ENTER> right with
Latin-2 fonts. It was FAR easier to provide an appriopritae
termcap/terminfo entry for this font encoding then to use any of the output
remapping stuff from kbd-0.94.
So Linus please take of all of the uncide stuff ot of the kernel. If it
would be even usable it doesn't belong there anyway....
Marcin
- Next message: kwrohrer@enteract.com: "Re: pre-31-7 does badblocks better than -6"
- Previous message: Peter Holzer: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
- Next in thread: Alex Belits: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
- Reply: Alex Belits: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"
- Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: UTF-8, OSTA-UDF [why?], Unicode, and miscellaneous gibberish"