non-Oops on 2.0.29

Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
Sat, 16 Aug 1997 23:37:45 +0200 (MET DST)


So far I have been recommending 2.0.29 as a beautiful stable
kernel, but the following just happened

invalid TSS: 0030
CPU: 0
EIP: 0030:[<0011127c>]
% 00111030 T schedule %
EFLAGS: 00000246
eax: 0000000d ebx: 00ef2018 ecx: 0000000d edx: 001fd434
esi: 011da830 edi: 011da830 ebp: 00efbfa8 esp: 00efbf80
ds: 0018 es: 0038 fs: 002b gs: 002b ss: 0018
Process runslip (pid: 48, process nr: 18, stackpage=00efb000)
Stack: 00002000 00efbfbc 00000001 00000000 011da810 00000000 00000000 00000000
00000000 00000000 bffffd5c 0010a254 00ef2018 0000cfe0 0010aae5 00000000
00000000 00000000 0000cfe0 00000001 bffffd5c fffffffc bfff002b 0000002b
Call Trace: [<0010a254>] [<0010aae5>]
% 0010a220 T sys_sigsuspend %
% 0010aa90 T system_call %
Code: general protection: 0030
CPU: 0
EIP: 0010:[<0010b069>]
EFLAGS: 00010202
eax: 00000030 ebx: 0009002b ecx: 0011127c edx: 01f0ac0c
esi: 00000000 edi: 00efc000 ebp: 00efbf44 esp: 00efbef4
ds: 0018 es: 0018 fs: 002b gs: 002b ss: 0018
Process runslip (pid: 48, process nr: 18, stackpage=00efb000)
Stack: 001e002b 00ef0030 00efbf44 011da830 00efbfa8 02800000 03000000 02800000
01ff0018 0010b3bd 001e1a6e 00efbf44 00ef0030 0000000b 00ef2018 0010b380
011da830 0010ac70 00efbf44 00ef0030 00ef2018 0000000d 001fd434 011da830
Call Trace: [<001e002b>] [<02800000>] [<03000000>] [<02800000>] [<0010b3bd>] [<0010b380>] [<0010ac70>]
[<0011127c>] [<0010a254>] [<0010aae5>]
Code: 66 8e e0 64 8a 04 0e 0f a1 88 c2 81 e2 ff 00 00 00 89 54 24

(That is, the protection fault happened while printing the first non-Oops.
My ksymoops segfaults today, so I just added % ... % comments.
More information on request.)

aeb@cwi.nl

[Of course, this may be a stray single bit error. I have never seen
something like this before.]