It might be preferred to make this patch against 2.1.49 instead of 2.0.x since
I believe something like this will probably not be added into 2.0 and more
likely to be thrashed about in 2.1.x.
If it were against 2.1.x, I'd test it to death. ;-)
Or if it wasn't too much trouble, make two versions.
I haven't tried to apply it to 2.1.x yet, so I'm just making rash assumptions
that it wouldn't go in cleanly.
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? Who knows? Who cares? OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything. Software is like sex; it's better when it's free. - Linus Torvalds IBM: It may be slow, but at least it's expensive. Microsoft: What do you want to own today?