Re: undelete?

Keith Rohrer (kwrohrer@uiuc.edu)
Sat, 26 Jul 1997 23:27:37 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: d_path to be removed?"
Previous message: milcom@netcom.com: "RE: [patch] QNX-style scheduling for Linux 2.0"
Maybe in reply to: Kurt Huwig: "undelete?"
Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: undelete?"

Kurt Huwig wrote:
> Indeed, this creates need for a 'de-fragmentation-tool' for Linux. I tried
> defrag-0.6, but it simply crashed (I know that ext2 doesn't want to
> fragment...)
Last I tried to recompile defrag-0.6, it didn't like the vaguely-modern
kernel includes...I think I sent the ext2 Lord High Guru and Fixer some
email, but never got anything back. *shrug* Anyway, I didn't see a
binary at the time, but the compile errors were about struct members
that went away, so I'm not surprised that your binary fell to software
rot...

Keith

-- 
The wisdom of G'Kar:
Bad Guys make a very satisfying THUMP when they hit the
ground.  But to thump the book of G'Quan is disrespectful.

Next message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: d_path to be removed?"
Previous message: milcom@netcom.com: "RE: [patch] QNX-style scheduling for Linux 2.0"
Maybe in reply to: Kurt Huwig: "undelete?"
Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: undelete?"