Compiling SMP, was Re: most "stable" devel kernel?

Larry M. Augustin (lma@varesearch.com)
Thu, 19 Jun 1997 09:57:06 -0700


"make SMP=1" is your friend.

Larry

>From: andersee@et.byu.edu (Erik B. Andersen)
>Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 22:15:32 MDT
>Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
>X-Mailer: Elm [revision: 112.7]
>Sender: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
>Precedence: bulk
>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Jun 1997 18:46:05 +0500, Andy Berkheimer wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >>Q: Am I supposed to comment off the SMP line in the Makefile, or just
>> >> set it to 0?
>> >
>> >Comment it out...the tests which check for it check for its existence,
>> >not its value.
>>
>> That sounds broken if you ask me.....
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Elite MicroComputers 908-541-4214 http://www.psychosis.com/emc/
>>
>
>Wouldn't it make sense to make this a config option, except then just
>have the config script run sed to adjust the makefile to either define
>or undefine SMP?
>
> -Erik
>
>--
>Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.inconnect.com/~andersen/
> email: andersee@debian.org
>--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
>