Re: most "stable" devel kernel?

Keith Rohrer (kwrohrer@uiuc.edu)
Tue, 17 Jun 1997 15:40:41 -0500 (CDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jon Lewis: "More pre-2.0.31-1 oops's...."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.1.43 inode cache problem?"

> On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Thomas Pornin wrote:
> > In article <Pine.LNX.3.91.970617091350.1055A-100000@chaos.analogic.com> you write:
> > >On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Erv Walter wrote:
> > >> However, can anyone give me their opinion on which of recent 2.1.x
> > >> kernels seems to be the most "stable?" I have heard 2.1.3[67].
I've had nary a hiccup with 2.1.29. The next couple releases were
crashy IIRC and then the kernel nfsd was added, so I stopped updating
for a while.

> (non-SMP by the way).
Ditto here.

Keith

Next message: Jon Lewis: "More pre-2.0.31-1 oops's...."
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.1.43 inode cache problem?"