Re: most "stable" devel kernel?

Richard B. Johnson (root@analogic.com)
Tue, 17 Jun 1997 09:19:15 -0400 (EDT)

On Tue, 17 Jun 1997, Erv Walter wrote:

> However, can anyone give me their opinion on which of recent 2.1.x
> kernels seems to be the most "stable?" I have heard 2.1.3[67].

Version 2.1.42 works very well, both SMP and non SMP. It has the usual
memory allocation problems being worked on and a few other bugs. But
it doesn't crash.

Cheers,
DJ
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard B. Johnson
Analogic Corporation
Email : rjohnson@analogic.com, johnson@analogic.com
Penguin : Linux version 2.1.42 on an i586 machine (66.15 BogoMips).
Warning : It's hard to stay on the trailing edge of technology.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-