Re: procfs problems

Miguel de Icaza (miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx)
16 Apr 1997 12:31:21 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Miguel de Icaza: "Re: Linux on PA/RISC"
Previous message: Simon Karpen: "Re: 2.1.34 build failure on sparc, patch enclosed"
In reply to: Harald Koenig: "Re: procfs problems"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: executable stacks, a few suggetions"

> > How about:
> >
> > architecture 80x86
> > platform pc-at
> > cpu 80486
> > cpu_vendor AMD
> >
> > (Tabs to separate fields. Fields may contain spaces.)
>
> DON'T use <TAB> as field separator, please!
> learn from the flaws e.g. from "make".

There is absolutely nothing wrong with having a tab as a separator.

Even the first examples in K&R book deal with tabs. Don't be silly.

Miguel.

-- 
miguel@roxanne.nuclecu.unam.mx     
The GNU Midnight Commander: http://mc.blackdown.org/mc
Linux/SPARC project:        http://www.geog.ubc.ca/sparclinux.html

Next message: Miguel de Icaza: "Re: Linux on PA/RISC"
Previous message: Simon Karpen: "Re: 2.1.34 build failure on sparc, patch enclosed"
In reply to: Harald Koenig: "Re: procfs problems"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: executable stacks, a few suggetions"