Re: glibc / linux fd_set collision

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 31 Mar 1997 20:16:33 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jeff Millar: "Prob: DEPMOD create blank modules.dep"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: init_etherdev() vs. register_netdev()"

> When is the collision between the struct fd_set defined in the linux
> include files and the one defined by the glibc include files going to be
> addressed?

When the glibc people fix it 8) In theory nothing should be sucking in the
kernel definitions when you are building with glibc. It's one of the things
that will isolate users from kernel changes

Next message: Jeff Millar: "Prob: DEPMOD create blank modules.dep"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: init_etherdev() vs. register_netdev()"