Re: Machine friendly format for /proc files

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Mon, 17 Feb 1997 22:38:52 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Andy Berkheimer: "Re: glibc and 2.1.26"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: /proc file system, seems to -not- have standardisation ?"
In reply to: Keith Rohrer: "Re: Machine friendly format for /proc files"

> (bleah part two) format, with the extra line's content not even aligned
> (bleah part three) with the major line... Matter of fact, the "bytes"
> and "carrier" entries are also misaligned (left and center, resp.) compared
> to the other headline entries (right)...

Yep. When it works nicely I'll worry about trivialities like formatting it
neatly.

Alan

Next message: Andy Berkheimer: "Re: glibc and 2.1.26"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: /proc file system, seems to -not- have standardisation ?"
In reply to: Keith Rohrer: "Re: Machine friendly format for /proc files"