Re: pppd 2.2.0f strangeness

Jon Lewis (jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net)
Sun, 16 Feb 1997 00:39:00 -0500 (EST)


On Sat, 15 Feb 1997, Michael Driscoll wrote:

> Hi Jon,
>
> >Feb 15 09:17:56 endor pppd[3830]: remote IP address 205.229.51.146
> >Feb 15 09:17:56 endor pppd[3830]: local IP address 205.229.48.4
> >Feb 15 09:17:56 endor pppd[3830]: remote IP address 205.229.51.146
> >Feb 15 09:18:10 endor pppd[3830]: local IP address 205.229.48.4
> >Feb 15 09:18:10 endor pppd[3830]: remote IP address 205.229.51.146
> ^^^^
> >Feb 15 09:18:54 endor in.fingerd[4397]: connect from ewok.fdt.net
> >Feb 15 09:18:46 endor kernel: Couldn't get a free page.....
> >Feb 15 09:20:09 endor pppd[3776]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
> ^^^^
> You seem to have been running 2 pppd's concurrently. Are you doing

That's just extra [unrelated] info in the log clippings I posted. I
should have stated what's obvious to me...this is a PPP "Server". It had
30something pppd's running at the time.

> anything weird when starting pppd that would cause this to happen?
> (This could be the entire problem because I've had some *weird* stuff
> happen while two copies of pppd were running...)

I have 64 ports (Cyclades...thus the ttyC? device mentioned in the log
clipping) in this box and regularly run 20-60 copies of pppd. This
particular box has been in service for "some time" (many months), so I'm
confident it's not a config problem at my end. Perhaps the client's PPP
implementation did something wacky, but that shouldn't have caused the
chaos his pppd process started.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______