Re: [masq] 1st virus in Linux :( (fwd)

Nathan Bryant (nathan@burgessinc.com)
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 09:30:00 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 11 Feb 1997, Ray Auchterlounie wrote:

> In article <Pine.LNX.3.95.970210105253.7863A-100000@gatekeeper.burgessinc.com>
> Nathan Bryant <nathan@burgessinc.com> wrote:
> [...]
> >> > > On Fri, 7 Feb 1997 tyson@rwii.com wrote:
> >> > > I don't agree. Doom has a known bug which allows any user on your system
> >> > > to get root if doom is installed setuid root. Every Linux distribution
> [...]
>
> >Unfortunately there is no DGA version of Doom. (Doom was released long
> >before DGA became available.) It would be nice if X servers other than
> >XFree86 supported DGA, too. :(
>
> At least according to a thread on c.o.l.d.s, DGA requires setuid root
> as well (or, quake suggests "chmod 666 /dev/mem" - erm...). Also DGA
> programs are responsible for dropping permissions themselves (SVGAlib
> does it for you).
>
> On that basis I'd say DGA looks worse for security than SVGAlib :-(

<CHANT>
GGI! GGI! GGI! GGI!
</CHANT>

+-----------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Nathan Bryant | Unsolicited commercial e-mail WILL be |
| nathan@burgessinc.com | charged an $80/hr proofreading fee. |
+-----------------------+---------------------------------------+